Skip to content

CEFR Goals and English Self-check

The CEFR describes what a person can do with language in context. It is not an app score or a fixed vocabulary count. This page simplifies the Council of Europe global scale to help you choose a starting point; it does not replace a formal assessment.

A1-C2: What Can I Do?

LevelObservable overall performance
A1Understand and use very common expressions; interact simply when the other person speaks slowly and helps.
A2Handle direct exchanges about familiar matters such as personal information, shopping, places, and work.
B1Understand the main points on familiar matters; handle most travel situations and briefly explain experiences, plans, and reasons.
B2Understand main ideas in complex concrete or abstract texts; interact fairly naturally and explain a viewpoint clearly.
C1Understand demanding, longer material and implicit meaning; use language flexibly in social, academic, and professional settings.
C2Understand almost everything heard or read with ease; synthesize sources, reconstruct arguments, and express fine distinctions precisely.

Source: Council of Europe, CEFR 3.3 Global Scale, accessed 2026-08-16. These are action-oriented summaries, not the official wording.

Four-skill Evidence

Choose one topic connected to real life. Complete the first version without looking things up and keep the raw sample.

Skill10–20 minute taskCheck
ListeningHear 2–4 minutes; record the main point, three details, and a retellingGist, detail, chunk boundaries, causes of misses
ReadingRead 600–1000 words; write five summary sentences and one challengeClaim, evidence, inference, whether unknown words block meaning
SpeakingRecord an unscripted two-minute explanationIntelligibility, pauses, grammar, chunks, task completion
WritingWrite a 180–250 word email, explanation, or argument in 20 minutesPurpose, structure, support, accuracy, revision

Save the samples in the English Diagnostic. Rate each skill separately when the profile is uneven.

Turn a Level into a Goal

A useful goal contains a context, task, quality threshold, deadline, and evidence.

In 12 weeks, I can deliver a five-minute project update covering context, progress, and risk. Listeners can restate the key points without switching language. I will keep recordings and feedback from weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12.

“Move from B1 to B2” is a direction, not a complete training goal. Progress is rarely linear and cannot be guaranteed by hours alone.

Seven-day Start

  • Day 1: complete four baselines and save the unpolished samples.
  • Days 2–5: choose one skill daily for 25–45 minutes of input, retrieval, output, and feedback.
  • Day 6: repeat the weakest task and compare error categories.
  • Day 7: complete the Weekly Review and choose one focus.

Thirty-day System

  • Complete at least one inspectable task in each skill every week; repeat the priority skill more often.
  • Classify errors as comprehension, vocabulary/chunks, pronunciation, grammar, structure, strategy, or attention.
  • Repeat an old task or a parallel task weekly and compare performance rather than feeling.
  • On day 30, repeat the baseline conditions and keep both samples plus external feedback.

Twelve-week Transfer

  • Weeks 1–4: establish rhythm with tasks below the frustration threshold.
  • Weeks 5–8: increase complexity and time pressure; transfer across topics.
  • Weeks 9–11: simulate the real exam, meeting, presentation, reading, or writing deliverable.
  • Week 12: complete the final task, obtain a blind or real-audience review, and choose the next cycle.

Feedback Rubric

Score each 0=not completed, 1=partly, or 2=consistently:

  1. Task completion: did the intended information and purpose arrive?
  2. Comprehensibility: could the audience understand without guessing?
  3. Accuracy and range: did language choices support the task?
  4. Organisation and fluency: was the message coherent without disruptive pauses?
  5. Revision and transfer: could you improve from feedback and reuse it in a new task?

Use totals only for your own longitudinal comparison, never as a label for another person.

Previous: Home | Next: Learning Principles

正文 CC BY-NC 4.0;站点与工具代码 MIT。